Vendor & MSP Scorecard
Synthetic dataInspired by OSFI Guideline B-10 Third-Party Risk Management (effective May 1, 2024) — illustrative
Concentration flag = institution-specific concentration risk. Exit plans: B-10 distinguishes stressed and non-stressed exit; "Tested" means both scenarios exercised.
| MSP | 99.5% | 98.7%Below | 18,500 | High | Flagged | Draft |
| Cloud | 99.95% | 99.92%Below | 4,200 | High | Flagged | Draft |
| Telecom | 99.9% | 99.4%Below | 6,300 | Medium | Flagged | None |
| Software | 99% | 97.9%Below | 9,600 | Medium | — | Tested |
| SaaS | 99% | 99.1%Met | 0 | Low | — | Draft |
Bluefin Managed Services
6-month SLA trend
Top incidents
- INC-4471 Batch scheduler outage (P1)
- INC-4398 Patch window overrun (P2)
- INC-4352 Monitoring gap on payments queue (P3)
FTE vs MSP mix (illustrative, 40-person team)
In-house FTE 50%MSP 50%
Annual cost
$4,660,000
Third-party risk index
55/100
Knowledge retention
45/100
Assumes CAD 135k loaded per FTE and CAD 98k per MSP seat. A higher MSP share lowers cost but raises concentration and exit risk.